Gotchas
The purpose of this guide is to document potential "gotchas" that contributors might encounter or should avoid during development of GitLab CE and EE.
describe
symbols
Don't Consider the following model spec:
require 'rails_helper'
describe User do
describe :to_param do
it 'converts the username to a param' do
user = described_class.new(username: 'John Smith')
expect(user.to_param).to eq 'john-smith'
end
end
end
When run, this spec doesn't do what we might expect:
spec/models/user_spec.rb|6 error| Failure/Error: u = described_class.new NoMethodError: undefined method `new' for :to_param:Symbol
Solution
Except for the top-level describe
block, always provide a String argument to
describe
.
Don't assert against the absolute value of a sequence-generated attribute
Consider the following factory:
FactoryGirl.define do
factory :label do
sequence(:title) { |n| "label#{n}" }
end
end
Consider the following API spec:
require 'rails_helper'
describe API::Labels do
it 'creates a first label' do
create(:label)
get api("/projects/#{project.id}/labels", user)
expect(response).to have_http_status(200)
expect(json_response.first['name']).to eq('label1')
end
it 'creates a second label' do
create(:label)
get api("/projects/#{project.id}/labels", user)
expect(response).to have_http_status(200)
expect(json_response.first['name']).to eq('label1')
end
end
When run, this spec doesn't do what we might expect:
1) API::API reproduce sequence issue creates a second label
Failure/Error: expect(json_response.first['name']).to eq('label1')
expected: "label1"
got: "label2"
(compared using ==)
That's because FactoryGirl sequences are not reseted for each example.
Please remember that sequence-generated values exist only to avoid having to explicitly set attributes that have a uniqueness constraint when using a factory.
Solution
If you assert against a sequence-generated attribute's value, you should set it explicitly. Also, the value you set shouldn't match the sequence pattern.
For instance, using our :label
factory, writing create(:label, title: 'foo')
is ok, but create(:label, title: 'label1')
is not.
Following is the fixed API spec:
require 'rails_helper'
describe API::Labels do
it 'creates a first label' do
create(:label, title: 'foo')
get api("/projects/#{project.id}/labels", user)
expect(response).to have_http_status(200)
expect(json_response.first['name']).to eq('foo')
end
it 'creates a second label' do
create(:label, title: 'bar')
get api("/projects/#{project.id}/labels", user)
expect(response).to have_http_status(200)
expect(json_response.first['name']).to eq('bar')
end
end
rescue Exception
Don't See "Why is it bad style to rescue Exception => e
in Ruby?".
Note: This rule is enforced automatically by Rubocop.
Don't use inline JavaScript in views
Using the inline :javascript
Haml filters comes with a
performance overhead. Using inline JavaScript is not a good way to structure your code and should be avoided.
Note: We've removed these two filters in an initializer.
Further reading
- Stack Overflow: Why you should not write inline JavaScript